What to prepare before requesting a Yudun VMP review

Start with one identified candidate

The candidate should be traceable to a build source and record package, version, signing plan, and file digest. If a file is not available yet, state whether the project is in design, development, or release preparation.

A rebuild, re-sign, or channel resource change creates a new candidate. Protection and compatibility conclusions must eventually bind to the final file.

• Build source and version
• Package and signing plan
• File digest or delivery record
• Planned release channels

Name the business paths that deserve protection

Do not stop at a request for strong hardening. Explain which algorithms, protocols, authorization checks, entitlements, or local decisions create business loss when recovered or modified.

Also identify decisions that can move server-side. Yudun VMP raises analysis and reuse cost for key client logic, but it does not replace server authorization and risk controls.

List the stack and compatibility range

For Android, state languages, build system, minimum and target systems, ABIs, native dependencies, hotfix tools, and dynamic loading. Cross-platform projects should include framework version and bridge approach.

Login, payment, mapping, push, media, risk, and vendor SDKs may affect class loading, native loading, or self-integrity checks. Include them in the first review.

• Languages, framework, and build
• System versions and ABIs
• Native and dynamic-loading paths
• Important third-party SDKs

Define validation and rollback before testing

Prepare unprotected application launch, critical-path, and resource baselines, and name the devices and systems that must be covered. Compare the protected candidate under the same conditions.

Define rollout range, stop conditions, and a recoverable version. Complete inputs are not paperwork. They determine whether a demonstration can become an actionable release decision.